← The Journal

Methods · 8 min

How reliable is an equine exercise test? Reading changes without overreacting

Blood lactate and heart rate do not vary equally between tests. Learn what research says about repeatability and how to compare your horse's results responsibly.

1 October 2026

A second fitness test only helps if the conditions are comparable. A different surface, protocol or sampling interval can move a lactate curve even when the horse's conditioning has not changed. The question is not simply ‘Did V4 rise?’ but ‘How much of this difference might be due to the test itself?’

What repeatability research actually found

A 2026 study of five treadmill protocols analysed 823 gallops from 64 Thoroughbreds. Mean heart rate during galloping showed good test–retest reliability overall (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC, 0.756). Recovery heart rate was less repeatable, with ICCs of 0.421 at 30 seconds and 0.595 at 90 seconds. Blood lactate responses were less consistent than galloping heart rate [1]. An ICC describes agreement across the study group; it is not a personal ‘acceptable change’ percentage for your horse.

Those horses galloped on a treadmill at controlled speeds and incline. The results do not give a universal error margin for a ridden field test. They do show why a small difference in a single lactate reading should not automatically be called a training effect [1].

Sport and surface are part of the measurement

In a field study of 21 competitive Warmblood show jumpers, the physiological demands of a standardized 1.10 m jumping course were statistically similar to cantering on a flat track at 8 m/s for the measured heart rate, blood lactate and venous pH. Other tested track speeds did not show that same comparison [2]. This is a comparison in that study population, not a conversion rule for every horse or course. A track result cannot describe every aspect of a jumping round.

How to make your next comparison more useful

  • Repeat the same route or treadmill setup, stage speeds, stage duration and warm-up where feasible.
  • Use the same sampling site, handling method and time after each stage; record any delay instead of hiding it.
  • Record rider, tack, surface, weather, recent work and any changes in health or medication.
  • Look at the whole pattern—speed, heart rate, lactate and recovery—rather than one threshold or one sample.
  • If a result seems unexpected, repeat under comparable conditions and discuss persistent changes with your veterinarian.

A test is a measurement, not a diagnosis. Repeated, carefully documented tests can help a trainer and veterinarian ask better questions; they cannot by themselves establish whether pain, illness or a training plan caused a change.

Ready to put the numbers to work?

Log your horse's step tests and recovery checks, and get VLa2, VLa4 and clear training zones on one curve.

Sources and further reading

Further reading